When I was taking my high school graduation exam, I had to give an oral presentation on a topic, and I made the mistake of choosing nuclear fusion. As a result, during the presentation, I found myself debating nuclear issues with examiners who simply considered the word "nuclear" as an insult, a danger to humanity, or even something criminal. I probably would have made a better impression discussing the drug business that day.. The examiners' mistake was firstly lumping fusion and fission together and, more importantly, religiously believing that wind turbines were the only viable alternative to fossil fuels. The topic of energy is divisive (especially in Europe) because it touches on ecological themes. (And teachers in high schools are quite politically oriented, by the way.) Yet, fusion could solve most of today's ecological issues. But to understand this, one must delve into the subject of fusion. Understand the difference between nuclear fusion and fission. But above all, understand the impact that fusion could have on the global economy. Because this impact is likely one of the most significant we would see, even more important than the advent of the internet and artificial intelligence. Today, I'm going to talk to you about all of this in detail. It's a topic I've been delving into for 5 years, discussing with nuclear engineers and reading content from economic experts on the subject. In this new section, called The Expansionist, dedicated to energy, I will bring in specialists to thoroughly explore this topic. In the rest of the article, you will read:
And in an upcoming section dedicated to Premium members:
Unlock all Premium posts:
Subscribe to AI Venture to unlock the rest.Become a paying subscriber of AI Venture to get access to this post and other subscriber-only content. A subscription gets you:
|
Kamis, 27 Juni 2024
Fusion and the economics of abundance.
Langganan:
Posting Komentar (Atom)
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar